EduTechBuddy covers education, artificial intelligence, educational technology, information technology, software, programming, and practical digital skills. As these fields increasingly intersect with AI systems, readers need clear distinctions between verified information, automated output, and conceptual imagery.
As a publication that explains artificial intelligence and its impact on learning and technology, we believe readers should understand how AI is used in our own publishing process.
Transparency is particularly important when synthetic images resemble real products, people, environments, or events that readers might otherwise assume were independently documented.
This policy describes the purposes for which EduTechBuddy uses AI, the editorial activities AI does not perform, our standards for visual authenticity, and the responsibilities retained by human editors.
AI Use at a Glance
Our current uses of AI in editorial production are summarized below.
- Generating conceptual illustrations
- Used
- Writing news articles
- Not used
- Drafting guides and tutorials
- Not used
- Writing reviews and rankings
- Not used
- Translating editorial articles
- Not used
- Summarizing research and sources
- Not used
- Automated news and source monitoring
- Not used
- AI-based editorial fact-checking
- Not used
- Automated publication decisions
- Not used
AI-Generated Illustrations
AI-generated illustrations may help readers visualize abstract concepts, technical processes, learning environments, and other subjects for which conceptual artwork is appropriate. Their value lies in supporting explanation rather than establishing the truth of factual claims.
Examples of Illustrative Subjects
- Artificial intelligence and machine learning concepts without a single literal visual representation.
- Digital classrooms and educational technology shown as conceptual learning environments.
- Software development and programming represented through illustrative technical scenes.
- Data systems, networks, and digital infrastructure shown for explanatory purposes.
- Online learning, digital literacy, and technology-based workflows represented without claiming that a specific event occurred.
- Conceptual representations of privacy and cybersecurity, without claiming to document an actual incident.
Illustrative Purpose
Conceptual artwork can support an article without being a record of something that happened. A fictional classroom, technical environment, or computer interface does not demonstrate that the depicted situation exists.
Readers should not have to infer from an image's realistic appearance whether a real-world claim has been independently verified.
Visual Accuracy
AI-generated images should be assessed for details that could mislead readers, particularly when an illustration resembles a real product, identifiable organization, person, location, or event.
An illustration should not introduce unsupported product features, fabricated research results, or false accounts of real situations. Synthetic visual details are not evidence for claims requiring independent support.
Authenticity, Captions, and Disclosure
The distinction between documentary imagery and conceptual artwork matters when readers evaluate factual claims. A realistic appearance is not equivalent to documentary authenticity.
Documentary Photographs
AI-generated illustrations must not be represented as authentic photographs of actual people, institutions, events, or locations. A conceptual depiction should remain distinguishable from a record of an occurrence.
Product Screenshots
Synthetic interface illustrations must not be presented as verified screenshots of actual software. A visually plausible interface may not correspond to the features or appearance of a real product.
Product functionality should be supported by relevant documentation or actual testing, not by a synthetic image alone.
Captions and Image Labels
Where an image could reasonably be mistaken for a real event, actual product interface, or documentary photograph, its illustrative nature should be clearly identified.
Appropriate descriptions may include "AI-generated illustration" or "Conceptual illustration," depending on the image. Captions and alternative text should accurately describe what is represented without suggesting unsupported authenticity.
Sensitive Visual Claims
Synthetic imagery must not be used as purported evidence of a cybersecurity breach, financial loss, legal incident, health condition, or safety event.
Human Editorial Control
Human editorial judgment remains responsible for deciding what EduTechBuddy publishes and how information is represented. Illustrative images do not replace the need for research, source evaluation, or accurate factual context.
- Editorial Research
- Sources should be evaluated using relevant original documentation, academic research, public records, and credible reporting where appropriate.
- Written Content
- News, explainers, guides, reviews, rankings, and analysis are prepared through human editorial work, not AI-generated article drafts.
- Verification
- Important factual claims require appropriate verification. AI-generated assertions are not a substitute for evidence.
- Visual Selection
- Human editorial judgment determines whether an illustration is relevant and whether it could materially mislead readers.
- Publication Decisions
- Publication, revision, clarification, and withdrawal remain editorial responsibilities.
- Corrections
- Verified material errors, including misleading visual representations, should be corrected or clarified as appropriate.
Editors consider the subject, supporting evidence, and potential reader impact when evaluating illustrations and factual claims.
Fabrication and Unsupported Claims
EduTechBuddy does not accept fabricated evidence, misleading attribution, or fictional information presented as established fact.
AI must not be used to fabricate or falsely represent:
- Academic studies or research papers.
- Source citations and references.
- Quotations or interview statements.
- Real people or professional experts.
- Academic degrees or credentials.
- Product benchmarks or testing results.
- Historical or current events.
- Endorsements, awards, or partnerships.
- Documentary photographs or screenshots.
- Statistics and measured outcomes.
A claim that appears credible still requires appropriate evidence. Its presentation does not independently establish accuracy.
How We Report on Artificial Intelligence
EduTechBuddy covers AI applications, educational uses, software capabilities, model reliability, limitations, and relevant research developments. Reporting should distinguish what a product is claimed to do from what available evidence establishes.
Company Announcements
Claims from AI companies should be attributed accurately. A provider's description does not automatically establish independent confirmation.
Benchmarks and Research
AI performance claims should be considered in relation to available methodology, evaluation conditions, dates, and limitations. Benchmark results should not automatically be generalized to every use case.
Hallucinations and Reliability
AI-generated responses may be fluent but factually incorrect. Unverified AI output should not be presented as authoritative evidence or a verified citation.
Educational Applications
Claims about AI improving learning or productivity should be considered against available research and the specific educational context. We do not promise guaranteed learning or professional outcomes.
AI, Sensitive Topics, and Reader Safety
AI coverage may intersect with cybersecurity, privacy, digital finance, regulations, education policy, and safety. These subjects can involve consequences beyond routine software use.
Reporting requires attention to uncertainty, credible evidence, risks, and relevant limitations. Neither promotional claims nor synthetic imagery should create unsupported confidence about consequential outcomes.
AI and Commercial Independence
EduTechBuddy uses Google AdSense display advertising but does not accept sponsored editorial articles, paid product reviews, purchased rankings, or affiliate commissions.
Policy Updates and Reader Feedback
We update this policy when our use of AI in editorial production changes.
Readers may report misleading AI-generated illustrations, inaccurate visual representations, or factual concerns. Providing the article URL and an explanation helps identify the issue.
Editorial: editorial@edutechbuddy.com
Corrections: corrections@edutechbuddy.com
Related policies:
Publication: EduTechBuddy